Answered By: Peter Z McKay
Last Updated: Oct 29, 2014     Views: 83

  • Economics of Food Lableing
    By Elise Golan, Fred Kuchler, Lorraine Mitchell, Cathy Green and Amber Jessup
    Journal of Consumer Policy
    Vol. 24, No. 2, 117-184, 2001.
    Federal intervention in food labeling is often proposed with the aim of achieving a social goal such as improving human health and safety, mitigating environmental hazards, averting international trade disputes, or supporting domestic agricultural and food manufacturing industries. Economic theory suggests, however, that mandatory food-labeling requirements are best suited to alleviating problems of asymmetric information and are rarely effective in redressing environmental or other spillovers associated with food production and consumption. Theory also suggests that the appropriate role for government in labeling depends on the type of information involved and the level and distribution of the costs and benefits of providing that information. This report traces the economic theory behind food labeling and presents three case studies in which the government has intervened in labeling and two examples in which government intervention has been proposed.
Open Access Economics of Food Labeling
By Elise Golan, Fred Kuchler, Lorraine Mitchell, Cathy Green and Amber Jessup.
Economic Research Service/USDA, 2000.
Food Labeling MilestonesOpen Source: Economics of Food Labeling, 2000 by the same authors Economic Research Service/USDA

Related Topics

Contact Us